It did not take long after the entry into force of GDPR on 25th May 2018 for many companies to revise their positions and business priorities following their initial scepticism towards the penalties that were to be imposed by the new regulation.
The reality of the number of financial sanctions enforced by European institutions on companies after barely one year of application of the European General Data Protection Regulation has made it clear that the EU pays close attention to the respect of its citizens data security and privacy rights.
📚 The educational approach to GDPR compliance
Member States dispose of national data protection cells or independent supervisory bodies (FIU) responsible for ensuring compliance with the fundamental principles of the protection of personal data at a national level.
They can carry out verifications at the organisation's premises or online. Checks are carried out based on annual programs, complaints received, or information in the media. For some countries where data privacy regulation is historically strict, fundamental principles of data protection remain mostly unchanged (data security, fair processing, retention period, etc.), and therefore continue to be rigorously checked by the data protection authorities.
On the other hand, the new obligations and rights resulting from GDPR are subject to investigation and remediation controls that are commonly non-punitive. The goal is to help organisations understand the issues and operational implementation of the new provisions and the benefits of compliance.
During the first months of the existence of the new legal European privacy framework, the national privacy authorities have accomplished a tremendous pedagogical work. Educating companies and delivering GDPR awareness in the various sectors of activity, publishing concrete fact sheets on privacy rights, and guides on safety or impact assessment methodologies.
In Belgium, since 25 May 2018, the Data Protection Authority (DPA) has been the successor to the Commission for the Protection of Privacy (better known as the "Privacy Commission")
⚖️ What are the latest sanctions and warnings under GDPR ?
Except the cases of serious data breaches or deliberate bad faith, national privacy supervisory bodies rather alert, support and accompany companies to GDPR compliance than imposing radical fines up to 4% of the company's turnover.
These additional powers, such as issuing warnings of non-compliance, carrying out audits, requiring specific remediation within a specified time frame, ordering erasure of data, and suspending data transfers to a third country, are easily accessible to the data protection supervisory authorities and supplement the new sets of penalties.
Nonetheless, some precedents have already broke records in the number of fines imposed for transgressing data protection principles.
Among the numerous pending national complaints and fine proceedings, sanctions have already been imposed. The following table provides a non-exhaustive regularly updated list of sanctions imposed by national European jurisdictions and authorities against non-compliant organisations.
The up-to-date list of recent GDPR Enforcement Actions
Date
Company
Country
Infos
Sanction
EU DPA
29/08/2019
SkellefteĂĄ High School
The Swedish DPA fined a school 200,000 Swedish Kroner for creating a facial recognition program in violation of the GDPR.
18.850€
25/07/2019
ACTIVE ASSURANCES
Insufficiently protected the data of the users of its website and implemented methods of storing inappropriate data.
180.000 €
06/06/2019
Sergic
Insufficiently protected the data of the users of its website and implemented methods of storing inappropriate data.
400.000 €
28/05/2019
City Mayor
Misuse of personal data by a mayor for campaign purposes. If the fine is moderate, its message is important: data protection is everyone's business, and data controllers must take responsibility, especially when they hold a public office..
2.000 €
21/01/2019
Google
Lack of transparency of the information provided by Google: "not easily accessible to users", unsatisfactory information, it is not "always clear and understandable", and a lack of valid consent for the personalization of advertising (Google appeal currently pending)
50.000.000 €
11/2018
Knuddels
leak in july 2018 of 808 000 emails and more than1,8 million of usernames and passwords of online chat platform
20.000 €
11/2018
UBER
Breach of the obligation to secure data. Failure to disclose a data breach. Leak of 57 million users and 600 thousand drivers account information (in July 2016 before GDPR was applicable)
1.385.000 €
CNIL, AP, ICO
06/2018
"SME"
Monitoring a public space without proper transparency and notice.retail establishment with a surveillance camera capturing too much of the sidewalk
4.800 €
ODSB - österreichische Datenschutzbehörde
06/2018
Barreiro Hospital
Violation of the principles of integrity and confidentiality of data, violation of the principle of limited access to data and inability for the data controller to ensure the integrity of the data.
400.000 €
CNPD - Comissão Nacional de Proteção de Dados
The general obligation of the controller is to always provide appropriate technical and organisational measures to ensure that the processing of European individuals' data is carried out in accordance with the GDPR.
Got your interest ? Don't leave yet !