EU Proposals for the facilitation of cross border distribution of investment funds

EU Proposals for the facilitation of cross border distribution of investment funds

A Proposal for a Directive which will amend, the Directive 2009/65/EC (UCITS IV Directive) and the Directive 2011/61/EU (AIFMD), was adopted on 12 March 2018 by the European Commission. The aim of the new Directive will be to facilitate the cross-border distribution of investment funds and eliminate the remaining bariers. The Proposal for the new Directive is accompanied by a Proposal for a Regulation on facilitating cross-border distribution of collective investment funds, amending the EuVECA and EuSEF regulations. Both Proposals are part of the EU Commission Action Plan on the Capital Markets Union.


The current “passporting” regime seems inadequate. As was underlined in the Press release document of the European Commission, 70% of all assets under management in EU are held by investment funds registered for sale in their domestic market, and only 37% of UCITS are registered for sale in more than three Member States. Hence, there is a much lower cross-border distribution activity.

We will not get into details regarding all the changes proposed for the Directive and the Regulation, but we will focus on the cornerstones of these Proposals.

• The marketing communication requirements for the investment funds will be harmonised and they will apply unanimously to both UCITS and AIFs and all asset managers. The Proposal does not also differentiate between retail and professional investors.

• The national authorities of the Member States will be bound to publish online in all applicable national laws, regulations and administrative provisions governing AIFs and UCITS. Moreover, the national authorities will have to publish all the fees, charges or relevant calculation methodologies used. ESMA will maintain a central database with all this information provided and an interactive tool in order to calculate online the amounts that must be paid.

• ESMA will also have to maintain a central database including information for all the AIFMs, UCITS management companies, AIFs and UCITS.

• One of the significant changes the Proposal will bring is the introduction of the definition of “pre- marketing”. For some countries, this may not be a tremendous change as they already have the notion of pre-marketing included in their legislation, but it is the first time that this definition is included in a Directive. In this way both AIF managers and UCITS managers can test if the fund will attract investors or not, and they will avoid the high costs of producing full documentation and submitting a notification file.

• Art. 92 of Directive 2009/65/EC is proposed to be amended: The Member State that imposes UCITS to have local physical facilities will be punished.

• Amendments regarding the de-notification process of both UCITS and AIFs. Asset managers are allowed to de-notify the marketing of their UCITS only if a maximum of 10 investors who hold up to 1% of assets under management of this UCITS have invested in this UCITS in a Member State. The same rule will apply for AIFs.

From an impact assessment perspective, the Proposals seem to be a good effort for the further facilitation of the cross-border distribution of investment funds. Provisions like the one of pre-marketing and de-notification will cover matters that currently are almost unknown in the existing framework.

  • de-notification: harmonising the requirements for de-notification will boost the marketing in different EU jurisdictions as the Managers will have clear rules of what to do in case of unsuccessful marketing of a fund.
  • pre-marketing: the same definition for all EU Members puts harmonisation a step further. However, it must still be clarified the fact that according to the new Proposal subscriptions to an AIF that was pre-marketed will be considered the result of marketing.

On the other side, associations like the City of London Law Society ("CLLS"), have expressed their concerns regarding the Proposals as according to them "Certain aspects of the proposals do not appropriately recognise the difference between UCITS as a pre-packaged retail product and AIFs as a negotiated institutional investor product".



The Proposals will be discussed by the European Parliament and the Council, and we wait for the outcome of these discussions.

Our experts can assist you in the notification of your investment fund in other Member States or the registration of your fund in third countries.

We provide turnkey solutions not only preparing and submitting the notification/application for you, but also keeping you up-to-date with all the relevant news and market updates.
Vasiliki Karamousali - Pideeco Network Partner
Vasiliki Karamousali Senior Consultant
< PREVIOUS ARTICLE Sun 27 October 2019

Outcomes of the FATF October 2019 Plenary Wee...

Mon 28 May 2018 NEXT ARTICLE >

Conduct Risk - Changing governance principles

0 comments
Add your comment